Re: NASCAR Hall of Shame

by bsoyuz Tue Mar 04, 2014 1:58 pm

You cut the sponsor. You cut the freaking sponsor!

by PYLrulz Tue Mar 04, 2014 7:18 pm

Mother of Invention wrote:

What am I supposed to look at?!? I mean the design on the 88 car isn't the best, but where is the fail at scratch

(or is it that obvious, and I need to catch up on some sleep Sleep

)

Edit: Wait! Nevermind! I think I need to recharge my batteries Fail

by Electric Wolf Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:51 pm

What is the issue? Wherever it is, I haven't seen it yet.

by Mother of Invention Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:36 pm

Casey Lester wrote:What is the issue? Wherever it is, I haven't seen it yet.

the Decal on the rear QP got cut off.

by SpiderTre Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:48 pm

by Backmarker Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:11 pm

SpiderTre wrote:

I love you, Jimmy Means... or hate to love you. (Love to hate you?)

by gone-sovereign Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:04 am

SpiderTre wrote:

Damn, you beat me to it. Razz

Gentlemen, may I remind you that this is a Nationwide car.

by Spannerhead29 (Nelson) Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:40 am

SpiderTre wrote:

What makes this even better is this.
NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 1653674_10203396436614725_2126587218_n

by Mother of Invention Sun Mar 30, 2014 12:48 am

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 Attachment

MWR Numbers ?

From Last Year?

by bsoyuz Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:05 am

Mother of Invention wrote:

MWR Numbers ?

From Last Year?

I've personally didn't saw any problem with it.

by Electric Wolf Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:44 am

Close, but no cigar.

by BooyakaDragon Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:03 pm

by Electric Wolf Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:47 pm

BooyakaDragon wrote:

No.

by Backmarker Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:54 pm

Casey, who ever put you in charge of deciding what does and doesn't qualify for the thread?

by Electric Wolf Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:39 pm

...that was stupid of me. Sorry, Booyaka. But aside from the wig/Madagascar 2 promotion (which is actually a decent business strategy), what else is wrong; his beard?

by Spannerhead29 (Nelson) Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:56 am

Casey Lester wrote:...that was stupid of me. Sorry, Booyaka. But aside from the wig/Madagascar 2 promotion (which is actually a decent business strategy), what else is wrong; his beard?

Him winning? idk

by Backmarker Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:50 pm

by BWard Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:59 pm

Just now:

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 BqMVoDLCYAA6CpX

by gone-sovereign Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:33 pm

BWardboy88 wrote:Just now:

Reminds me of this from 1995:

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 Martin1

by PYLrulz Sun Jun 15, 2014 9:19 pm

kensethfan wrote:
BWardboy88 wrote:Just now:

Reminds me of this from 1995:

Since we are posting that... Sterling Marlin at Charlotte in 1998

by Rykia Sun Jun 15, 2014 9:29 pm

While we're at it...
NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 NF3MAgil

by RyanB06 Sun Jun 15, 2014 9:32 pm

None of the last four cars belong here, IMO.

by PYLrulz Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:09 pm

I do miss though where most anywhere, just so some laps can be done by a driver, the team just shears as much metal as they could off the car to the point of looking like what we post, instead of grabbing spare bits left and right

by gone-sovereign Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:02 am

RyanB06 wrote:None of the last four cars belong here, IMO.

They still look silly. That's good enough for me. Very Happy

by gone-sovereign Sat Jul 05, 2014 12:08 pm

If bumping this topic isn't too much trouble...

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 18interstate-stripes-dis2-ibtwit

WHOSE IDEA WAS THIS. That is all.

by Mother of Invention Sat Jul 05, 2014 12:41 pm

Needs Wrigley decals, not Interstate!

by gone-sovereign Sat Jul 05, 2014 6:56 pm

Mother of Invention wrote:Needs Wrigley decals, not Interstate!

A different sponsor wouldn't do that car justice. Zebra stripes on a Cup car are just plain ugly.

by BooyakaDragon Mon Jul 07, 2014 7:01 am

That #18 for some reason reminds me of Marijuana.

by bigdc48 Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:23 am

by Pyrozooka0 Fri Jul 18, 2014 12:04 pm

kensethfan wrote:If bumping this topic isn't too much trouble...

WHOSE IDEA WAS THIS. That is all.

This thing is so ugly that it is glorious.

by RACECAR Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:49 pm

So looking on this page, I understand the 79 being here (especially since its a Nationwide car for crying out loud), but why the wrecked cars? We're not seriously expecting cars that damaged to look right-off-the-trailer good, are we?

by PYLrulz Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:11 pm

RACECAR wrote:So looking on this page, I understand the 79 being here (especially since its a Nationwide car for crying out loud), but why the wrecked cars? We're not seriously expecting cars that damaged to look right-off-the-trailer good, are we?

It was more for the tape jobs for the numbers and such. Yeah, it's not going to look good, but it was more for the giggles if anything

by Pyrozooka0 Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:26 pm

PYLrulz wrote:
RACECAR wrote:So looking on this page, I understand the 79 being here (especially since its a Nationwide car for crying out loud), but why the wrecked cars? We're not seriously expecting cars that damaged to look right-off-the-trailer good, are we?

It was more for the tape jobs for the numbers and such. Yeah, it's not going to look good, but it was more for the giggles if anything

Yeah, I hate how people demand set criteria when it comes to HOSes.

by SpeedDemon37 Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:16 pm

I know it's a show car, but it's still comical.

Spoiler:

by BooyakaDragon Mon Aug 04, 2014 4:09 pm

by BWard Mon Aug 04, 2014 4:17 pm

BooyakaDragon wrote:

Maybe now it's a good thing that wasn't one of her 2012 Sprint Cup cars.

by Mother of Invention Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:39 am

A trifecta of Ewwwww!

The Seemingly normal #38 KNPW Car

http://jasonowatson.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/20140503-Stockton-150-NASCAR-K-N-Series-West/G0000G9M_9_7773Q/I0000kafKPcPntAY/C00004mEm9y34BJI

Becomes the haphazardly redone #14 car

https://www.1fastcar.com/sa/photo/samp.asp?g={E2D4E536-B944-4D3B-A0F9-118E2BBC98E4}

which in turns becomes the holy grail of fail #54 car

http://cdnmo.coveritlive.com/media/image/201408/php21dLEJimage.jpeg

by Mother of Invention Thu Apr 02, 2015 12:24 am

Speaking of terrible K&N West cars, they were out in force at Kern County this weekend.

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 8yQgUf0

by simonracer Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:20 am

Those cars are all bad in their own way, but that last car takes the cake. It's one thing to take a car, cover up its numbers and then put new tape numbers on top, but putting tape numbers on a car over the top of the old numbers without covering up the old numbers is even worse. They didn't even bother putting the new number on the roof of the car. Seriously, how terrible can you get?

by SpeedDemon37 Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:33 pm

Another case of manufacturer mixing, this time with Mansion Motorsports's 2001 Intrepitaurus.

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 85dodge-nose

by Pyrozooka0 Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:12 pm

Regan Smith is now officially the unluckiest driver in NASCAR: He has to drive this thing NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 7toystate-side-nasmedia

by NASCARLOVER427 Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:39 pm

Pyrozooka0 wrote:Regan Smith is now officially the unluckiest driver in NASCAR: He has to drive this thing

I actually like that car.

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 Gv53454c8b

by bsoyuz Sun Jan 31, 2016 7:38 pm

Pyrozooka0 wrote:Regan Smith is now officially the unluckiest driver in NASCAR: He has to drive this thing

Why the hell would you put that on the Hall of Shame, it's just a exagerated scheme.

by Spannerhead29 (Nelson) Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:57 am

Pyrozooka0 wrote:Regan Smith is now officially the unluckiest driver in NASCAR: He has to drive this thing

That''ll probably be one of the best schemes of the year, at least out of the back-marker teams.

by gone-sovereign Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:58 am

Pyrozooka0 wrote:Regan Smith is now officially the unluckiest driver in NASCAR: He has to drive this thing

I agree with the people above, I quite like that scheme. Almost every paint scheme we've seen for 2016 has looked so basic and bland, so to have a paint scheme that's got something interesting going on is quite satisfying.

Moment of silence for any ingenuity paint schemes have had before this season. R.I.P. Crying or Very sad

by Dexter249 Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:00 pm

Time For Some Fail
NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 -abd3f7b020b00019

The Reason This Is A Fail Please Look At The Decals Also More Pictures
NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 482656568-the-truck-of-korbin-forrister-driver-of-the-gettyimages

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 482656568-the-truck-of-korbin-forrister-driver-of-the-gettyimages

And Even More
NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 08bms

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 080115_NASCAR_TrumpTruck_PI_JP.vresize.1200.675.high.47

by RyanB06 Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:05 pm

Just because you don't like the sponsor DOES NOT MAKE A SCHEME FAIL.

by bsoyuz Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:10 pm

I hate Trump, but that is actually a well done scheme, far from fail.

by gone-sovereign Mon Feb 01, 2016 3:30 pm

Now for something that actually IS Hall of Shame worthy.

NASCAR Hall of Shame - Page 6 10002710

This was from either 2008 or 2009 from the looks of it; obviously this car never ran. Say what you will about the paint scheme, but that's not what I'm trying to draw attention to. Just look at the nameplate. And also the bad Photoshop of AJ.

by Sponsored content