Is parity better than domination in Cup?

A quote from NASCAR.com:

One-third of the 2012 Cup season is already in the books with 12 "official" points races turned, and we have nearly that many winners.

The history of NASCAR has provided us with both ebbs and flows from the winning multiplicity of the current age to the singular dominance of the ages of Richard Petty, Cale Yarborough, Dale Earnhardt and even the recent quintet of Jimmie Johnson. Race fans have seen both before and will see both again. But which is truly better: Parity or dominance?

It's funny cause like 3-4 teams have won this season. So claiming there's "parity" in this year's Nascar is a load of crap. Dominance have been the trend of Roush, Hendrick and Gibbs this season.

Alta wrote:It's funny cause like 3-4 teams have won this season. So claiming there's "parity" in this year's Nascar is a load of crap. Dominance have been the trend of Roush, Hendrick and Gibbs this season.

Let's see here...

Roush Fenway Racing with Kenseth and Biffle
Stewart Haas Racing with Stewart and Newman
Penske Racing with Keselowski
Joe Gibbs Racing with Hamlin and Busch
Hendrick Motorsports with Johnson and Kahne

Yep, sounds about right.